Talk:Emperors
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This is all straight Stareye canon from Stewart I backwards.
- So? Drakey
- Well, that kind of poses a problem for those of us who don't buy into *i canon. I don't object to it being included, I just object to it not being marked as such. Or at least make it known that from Stewart I backwards, the list is speculative, not authoritative. ACK47 01:54, 30 March 2006 (CST)
- Drakey and Aran: You know how I keep asking for a definitive statement of scope and purpose for EE? I'm okay with the way it is, of course, but it really needs to be marked down for everyone to see. This has come up at least three times since I started, so if you don't write it I'm going to. --- Slarty 09:13, 30 March 2006 (CST)
- I'll get on it this evening. Arancaytar | Send Reply! --- That is not dead which can eternal lie... 09:28, 30 March 2006 (CST)
- Drakey and Aran: You know how I keep asking for a definitive statement of scope and purpose for EE? I'm okay with the way it is, of course, but it really needs to be marked down for everyone to see. This has come up at least three times since I started, so if you don't write it I'm going to. --- Slarty 09:13, 30 March 2006 (CST)
- Well, that kind of poses a problem for those of us who don't buy into *i canon. I don't object to it being included, I just object to it not being marked as such. Or at least make it known that from Stewart I backwards, the list is speculative, not authoritative. ACK47 01:54, 30 March 2006 (CST)
- So? Drakey